Posts Tagged referendum

Maine chance for direct democracy

Next month I’m off to Bournemouth for Lib Dem party conference. One of the many things I like about our conferences is that the members who attend really make policy – it’s not just a rally. So it’s appropriate that the very first motion for debate is all about improving direct democracy at national level.

Two of the most interesting proposals are for People’s Bills and a People’s veto.

With People’s Bills, the idea is to let the voters set the agenda. The six legislative proposals that received the most petition signatures from registered voters in any given year would be guaranteed a second reading debate in the House of Commons. It doesn’t mean the law would necessarily get passed – that responsibility would still sit with MPs – but it does mean that ideas can get a real chance to become law even if they are not on the Government’s legislative programme.

What’s more if Government legislation is unpopular, citizens could apply a People’s Veto. If one million registered voters petitioned against an Act within 60 days of it being passed, a referendum
would have to be held on whether or not to repeal it.

This process might not have stopped the Iraq War (no legislation there) – but it could potentially have reversed such controversial measures as the poll tax or the Dangerous Dogs act, Section 28 or the hunting ban. And it could ensure a real public debate on issues like nuclear power, ID cards, or a third runway at Heathrow.

Even if the results in terms of legislation implemented are not dramatically different, the impact on the process of having people – and politicians – aware that they can really influence the agenda between elections could be revolutionary.

A similar process already works in the US state of Maine. Their state motto is Dirigo (I lead). Where they lead, perhaps we should follow.

Comments (5)

What should Ed have said?

Maybe I was only half-awake but I felt a bit frustrated by Ed Davey’s comments on the Today programme this morning re the Lisbon Treaty debate.

Normally Ed is excellent at getting the key message out of any story. This morning he was up against a Labour Euro-sceptic backbencher and managed to sound as if he was defending not only the Treaty – Ed made good points on fighting terrorism, crime and pollution – but also the Government’s handling of it.

In the same way that all quiz questions are easy when you’re at home yelling at the TV, I found myself thinking of my ideal response.

There are things in the Treaty that are in Britain’s best interests, so we are voting for them

However there should be proper debate; this arrogant government won’t even listen to its own backbench MPs

In fact we need a real debate on the real issue: Europe in or out, and let the people not just MPs have their say.

Is the Government listening? Don’t hold your breath.

Leave a Comment

Clauses vs causes


Today the EU Reform treaty was signed by all the EU heads of government – kind of. Gordon Brown signed by himself after the group celebrations this morning, presumably hoping distance would lend enchantment to the view.

What Gordon may think is nifty footwork just looks inept to everyone else. Unlike our own Vince Cable, I can’t see the PM making a success of Strictly Come Dancing.

He had a clear choice; sign up with pride, trumpet his ‘red lines’ and make the British case for Europe. Or say ‘I want no part of this’, and refuse to sign. Signing up furtively achieves nothing.

If the treaty turns out to be bad news, Gordon Brown will still be responsible for signing us up to it; if it’s a success he’s airbrushed himself out of the historic photos. Unless he’s planning to do a Purnell, of course…..

The debate over a European treaty referendum rumbles on. I think debates over clauses mask the real issue. Section 28 wasn’t really about the curriculum; it was the last gasp of the homophobes. Clause 4 in the Labour party wasn’t just about economic policy; it was the last gasp of old socialism. If we are to have a referendum – as we should – then let’s have it on the real issue: Europe in or out.

Just because the Prime Minister is coy about where he stands on Europe, that’s no reason to deny we citizens our say.

Leave a Comment

Referendums* all the rage

It’s only Tuesday morning but this week we’ve already had both the Lib Dems and the Conservatives proposing referendums (*or referenda), on Europe and Council Tax respectively.

The Lib Dems have been characterised as uncritically pro-Europe, and we’ve not always done much to challenge that. We should.

I believe that countries working together to solve problems like climate change, terrorism, trafficking and pollution makes sense; I believe that the right response to globalisation and the power of multi-nationals is to have strong international institutions, not fragmentation; I believe that the EU has given its members peace and prosperity and I want to be part of that. But I’ve never had the chance to say so.

I have dim memories of the last Euro referendum (I favoured the anti EU vote then solely on the basis that their ads were funnier) but as Vince Cable reminds us, those of us whose working lives are now affected by the EU have never had a vote on it. And we should. Let’s have a vote on the real question – do we think we are better off in the EU or not? And let all the parties be honest on their position.

Of course, the Tories don’t have a united position on Europe. Which may of course may be part of the they rushed out their own refendum idea – on council tax.

As far as the Tories’ proposals for council tax go, to paraphrase Dr Johnson, their proposals are both original and good; but the bits that are good aren’t original, and those that are original aren’t any good.

The idea of having a referendum on the level of council tax increase isn’t new. And like all the best Tory policies these days, it’s nicked from the Lib Dems. Where Lib Dem councils have had council tax referendums, they have shared the honest choice between modest increases plus service cuts with larger increases to raise investment in local services.

The difference in the Tory plans is firstly that the decision to hold a referendum – the ‘trigger’ point – will be set by the man in Whitehall. This means that a local election could be fought and won on the premise that an increase in spending in local services was needed, only for the Whitehall dictat to force a referendum on that same issue.

Secondly their referendum would not affect the council tax level which had triggered the referendum – but would force a rebate in the following year’s tax. That makes a nonsense of budget planning – councils would be tied into a council tax cut even before they know the level of Government grants, the demand for services or the local mood. One year the council puts up council tax to build a new old people’s home or swimming pool; the next it has to raise charges or reduce access to the same facility because of the forced rebate. It’s a recipe for increasing the kind of binge-budgeting – up the year after elections, down the year before them – which already gives council services roller-coaster financing.

What the Tories are failing to do is address the inherent unfairness of council tax. It’s not related to ability to pay, but on the (notional) value of your home. So you may face a bill you can’t afford calculated on the basis of an asset you cannot liquidate and may not even own. Unlike inheritance tax, council tax is a property tax that everyone pays, every year. And because it only raises at most a quarter of local council expenditure, you have to cut £4 from budgets for every £1 cut in council tax.

Abolishing council tax, replacing it with a system based on ability to pay and raised via the existing income tax system would be fairer, simpler – and save a fortune on council tax collection, benefits – and rebates. Only the Lib Dems are promising to axe council tax.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not opposed to referendums or to rebates. Here in Islington, the Lib Dem council has given us both this year. I got a £20 rebate on my council tax because I pay by direct debit, saving the council time and costs (I took the option to give the £20 to Islington’s Climate Change fund, so no extra drinks, sorry). The Lib Dems have consistenly kept their pledge to keep council tax below the London average, so no need for a referendum on that. But we did get a referendum vote on whether the Council should switch the cost of residents’ onstreet parking permit from a £95 to a banded scheme based on CO2 emissions.

All the parties on the Council (Lib Dem, Labour, and the lone Green) supported the permit change. But only the Lib Dems supported a referendum. Why? Having been elected on a pledge not to raise parking charges, the Lib Dems felt it was right to have a vote before breaking that pledge. Meanwhile our Labour MP showed her contempt for democracy by ripping up her ballot paper, and urging others to do the same; a misjudgement. Lib Dem trust in the people paid off; a majority in every ward for putting green taxes into action.

That’s the right way to do referendums. A clear question on a basis of clear principle. No wonder Labour won’t support them.

Comments (1)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.